| Back
to Press Room
|
Coalition
for Smarter Growth &
Audubon Naturalist Society
PRESS RELEASE
September 17, 2004
Contacts: Laura Olsen, (202)
244-4408 or
Brian Henry, 301-652-9188 x 18 bhenry@audubonnaturalist.org |
Officials Drop Claims of ICC Congestion Relief
Narrow Study Excludes Potentially Better Alternatives
|
According to Washington Post reporter Steve Ginsberg, “State officials
have dropped claims that the Intercounty Connector (ICC) would reduce traffic
congestion on the Capital Beltway or other major roads”—severely weakening
prior justification for this project.
And now, the state officials have commissioned a study by the Univ. of Maryland
making claims on the economic benefits of an ICC. The study is an example of State
Highway Administration official’s on-going effort to ignore viable alternatives
to an ICC that could have better economic results—and focus narrowly on
building or not building a six-lane toll-highway.
Within the confines of the limited study, researchers found over 60% of the
total jobs created would be low-paying, retail jobs. At a total cost of $3 billion
including financing for the ICC, taxpayers are shelling out $178,000 per job for
the nearly 17,000 jobs the report claims.
And, with state officials confirming that an ICC would not reduce traffic on
the Beltway or other major highways, researchers found only limited, negligible
freight truck benefits.
By looking only at building an ICC or not building an ICC the State Highway
Administration has gone out of its way to avoid a comprehensive analysis of alternatives
that could better serve the region.
"An ICC would cost $3 billion—including financing. This study fails
to analyze what the best economic return is for such a large investment of transportation
dollars. It fails to compare the economic benefits of investing in transit in
Prince George’s and throughout the region, basic road improvements, and
prioritizing home and job development around transit areas, particularly in Prince
George’s," said Audubon Naturalist Society's Executive Director Neal
Fitzpatrick.
The study also ignores the cost of tolls—which are essential to the financing
plan for the ICC—the costs of longer commutes for those outside the study
area in Prince George’s County who have access to too few jobs, and the
environmental costs of the ICC including impacts on parks, recreation, wildlife,
and air and water quality.
###
|