![]() |
|
Back to Press Room
Today, Local officials, smart growth and environmental organizations released their initial critique of the draft environmental impact study (DEIS) on the Intercounty Connector, the most controversial highway project proposed in decades. The study is about 1500 pages long and has about 3000 pages of additional traffic analysis and appendices. “The State’s own study of the ICC shows it is a lose-lose-lose situation for Marylanders,” said Stewart Schwartz, Executive Director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “The governor is asking Maryland taxpayers to go into debt spending $3 billion or more for an 18 mile toll road, one that adds traffic to the beltway and damages or destroys over 7,000 acres of forests, farms, wetlands and drinking water reservoirs. $3 billion with debt, no traffic relief, and massive environmental damage -- that’s why we call it lose-lose-lose. This is no solution.” The groups focused on five areas of serious concern about the study including the quality of the study and its fast tracked release, the $3 billion cost of the 18 mile toll road, the lack of traffic relief for the Beltway, the major environmental impacts and the failure to consider any alternatives in the study. “In 1997, the US Environmental Protection Agency commented that for a road with such gross environmental and community impacts, it has relatively little effect on traffic congestion. In 2004, that is still the overwhelming conclusion one gets from reviewing the new DEIS,” noted Lee Epstein, Director of the Lands Program at the Chesapeake Bay Foundation. Fiscally irresponsible "The Intercounty Connector is bad for Prince George's, and it is bad for the state of Maryland. The enormous expense of the ICC threatens future funding for roads and transit across the state. This won't solve traffic congestion problems," said Delegate Pauline Menes. No Traffic Relief for the Beltway “The study clearly refutes the notion that an ICC would somehow end gridlock,”
said Greenbelt Mayor Judith S. Davis. “We can’t afford a $3 billion
project that makes beltway traffic worse and will have additional impacts which
have not even been studied, on local and secondary roads.” “Why would we spend record amounts of money on a project that has gotten even more environmentally damaging and still doesn’t relieve traffic?” asked Delegate Barbara Frush. Process Designed to Limit Public Involvement “The State should be ashamed for trying to jam a $3 billion highway project down the throats of Maryland residents without even a pretense of true public discourse,” noted Schwartz. Quality of the Study Questioned “When I was Chief, Branch of Environmental and Economic Analysis for the US Department of the Interior, I would have rejected this DEIS as not being a DEIS, but the world’s largest Environmental Assessment (a preliminary analysis) requiring that a real DEIS be done,” stated Jim Fary of the Montgomery County Sierra Club who read the entire DEIS. “This isn't so much a draft EIS as a drafty one -- full of holes, lots of empty space and air. The state could have studied this highway proposal properly and objectively, but didn't. Federal law demands that they do so," noted Epstein. The groups released their initial critique at the first of four public hearings on the ICC, the public’s first opportunity to testify on the controversial $3 billion proposal for an 18 mile toll road in Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties. Over 240 residents have already signed up to testify at the four scheduled public hearings. Hearings are scheduled for: Tues. Jan 4th, 5-11 pm, Eleanor Roosevelt High, 7601 Hanover Parkway, Greenbelt,
MD For more information on signing up for the hearings or to submitting comments see www.SaveCommunities.org -- end --
| |||||||
![]() Coalition for Smarter Growth 4000 Albemarle St, NW, Suite 310 Washington, DC 20016 (202) 244-4408 (202) 244-4438 fax www.smartergrowth.net © 1999-2005 Coalition for Smarter Growth. All Rights Reserved. |
|||||||