Calendar of Events
 Site Toolbox
In the News
Media Resource Center
Take Action!
Newsletters
Alerts
Sign Up

 Current Issues
Air Quality
Health
Housing Choices
Land Use
Adequate Public Facilities
New Urbanism
Open Space
The Region Divided
Sprawl
Transit-Oriented
Smart Growth
Transportation
Bike and Walk
Car Sharing
Roads
   • Beltway
   • I-66
   • Outer Beltway
   • Battlefield Bypass
   • Intercounty Connector
   • Techway
   • Tri-County Parkway
   • Western Bypass
Transit
   • Dulles Corridor
   • Purple Line
Water Quality

 Issues by Region
Metro Region
District of Columbia
Maryland
Montgomery
Prince George's
Virginia
Alexandria
Arlington
Fairfax
Loudoun
Prince William
National

 About Us
Our Vision for the Region
About the Coalition
Contact Us

 

 

Back to Press Room


For Release:   For More Information Contact:
June 15, 2007   

Stewart Schwartz, 202-244-4408 x121
Allen Muchnick, VBF, (703) 271-0895   
Roger Diedrich, SC, (571) 334-0835


Will $2.7 Billion be Wasted on Flawed Tysons Corner Elevated Stations?

VDOT Announces Road Design that Undermines Tysons Corner Replanning ProcessHostile Environment for Pedestrians will Lead to Lower Ridership and Higher Subsidies

A just received letter from the Virginia Department of Transportation indicates that VDOT intends to expand Routes 7 and 123 into 8-lane (plus double left turn lane) roadways that will create a hostile environment for pedestrians and bicyclists.  VDOT first showed this design to the Tysons Corner Task Force on May 21st.  The Task Force expressed significant concerns about the design, which could completely undermine the replanning of Tysons Corner for transit-oriented development.  At the June 4th presentation to the Fairfax Board of Supervisors, representatives of the Dulles Rail project showed sterile station designs in the middle of and adjacent to these large roadways.“The proposed designs for the Tysons Corner stations and surrounding roadways demonstrate that VDOT/VDRPT and the project engineers fail to understand how to design an effective transit system,” said Stewart Schwartz, Executive Director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth.“The project station illustrations show a landscape dominated by 10-lane, high speed roadways, too few crossings, and a very hostile environment for pedestrians and bicyclists,” said Allen Muchnick of the Virginia Bicycling Federation.

If people do not enjoy the walk to and from the stations, they will be far less likely to use transit.   Fewer transit riders mean more cars and traffic, higher costs per rider and higher subsidies.  “If we are going to spend up to $2.7 billion, then let’s get this done right,” said Roger Diedrich of the Virginia Chapter of the Sierra Club.  “The tunnel option should be kept alive so that we can achieve better urban design for Tysons Corner, include the option for express tracks, and maximize transit ridership and pollution reduction.”

“There is overwhelming public agreement that the tunnel is the best system for Tysons Corner, because most people recognize that the tunnel allows for better urban design.  It would allow us to match the success of the underground system in Arlington’s Rosslyn-Ballston Corridor,” said Douglas Stewart of FABB.  “But a big part of that success is also tied to having the right scale and designs for the surrounding streets and roads.”

“We see VDOT’s proposed roadway designs to be a fatal flaw for the rail project.  This problem must be addressed or both the Tysons redesign process and the rail system itself could fail,” concluded Schwartz.

#####

Dulles Rail Project presentation to the Fairfax Board of Supervisors, June 4, 2007 (see slides 6 to 22)
Coalition for Smarter Growth sign-on letter to Virginia Department of Transportation about Tysons Corner roadways.

 
Coalition for Smarter Growth
4000 Albemarle St, NW, Suite 310
Washington, DC 20016
(202) 244-4408    (202) 244-4438 fax

www.smartergrowth.net

© 1999-2005 Coalition for Smarter Growth. All Rights Reserved.