Calendar of Events
 Site Toolbox
In the News
Media Resource Center
Take Action!
Newsletters
Alerts
Sign Up

 Current Issues
Air Quality
Health
Housing Choices
Land Use
Adequate Public Facilities
New Urbanism
Open Space
The Region Divided
Sprawl
Transit-Oriented
Smart Growth
Transportation
Bike and Walk
Car Sharing
Roads
   • Beltway
   • I-66
   • Outer Beltway
   • Battlefield Bypass
   • Intercounty Connector
   • Techway
   • Tri-County Parkway
   • Western Bypass
Transit
   • Dulles Corridor
   • Purple Line
Water Quality

 Issues by Region
Metro Region
District of Columbia
Maryland
Montgomery
Prince George's
Virginia
Alexandria
Arlington
Fairfax
Loudoun
Prince William
National

 About Us
Our Vision for the Region
About the Coalition
Contact Us

 


Testimony to the Base Realignment and Closure Commission

By Stewart Schwartz, Executive Director, Coalition for Smarter Growth

July 7, 2005

Thank you Congresswoman Norton, Chairman Principi and members of the Commission for the opportunity to testify today. The Coalition for Smarter Growth is a region-wide network of civic, transit, planning and environmental organizations whose members have been engaged in transportation and land use planning for the National Capital Region since the late 1980’s.

We ask the Commission to reject proposals to move as many as 23,000 jobs from transit accessible locations in Arlington and DC, and that you fully consider the negative transportation impacts and costs of new transportation infrastructure for defense jobs proposed to be moved to Fort Belvoir, Fort Meade, Bethesda NMC, and Quantico MCB. We believe that the proposed moves would fail to meet your Military Value Criteria in terms of “operational readiness” and “manpower implications.” They would also fail to meet your Other Criteria including “economic impact” on communities, the “ability of the infrastructure” to support these forces, and the “environmental impact.”

For many years now, the National Capital Region – through plans and policies by the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, the National Capital Planning Commission, and the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority -- has committed to reducing traffic congestion and associated air pollution by building the world-class Metrorail system at a cost of over $10 billion and by focusing development in mixed-use, walkable centers at Metrorail stations.

The COG Transportation Planning Board Vision, COG’s Smart Growth Begins at the Local Level presentation; their recent job-access analysis; and their alternative growth scenarios analyses all reflect their planning vision and indicate the benefits of the transit-oriented development approach to regional growth. In fact, the annual Texas Transportation Institute report shows that the region’s traffic delays would be 50% longer had it not been for our investment in our transit systems.

DOD office locations in DC and Arlington are served by carpools and the famous “slug” system; and by commuter rail; Metrorail, Metrobus, county bus services, and private bus services and van pools. During the critical rush hour, federal workers represent nearly 50% of Metrorail riders. Many, if not most, workers have sought to arrange their home locations and commutes to take advantage of existing transit and carpool infrastructure to commute to work.

The shift of so many defense jobs and thousands more contractors to locations without rail transit and with inadequate road infrastructure will lead to large increases in auto commuting and extreme traffic congestion on already overburdened highways and local roads surrounding these facilities, with associated negative impact on the operations and mission effectiveness of DOD agencies. Moreover, the increase in driving and fuel consumption would add to national energy dependency, another important national security consideration.

It can also be expected that this increase in driving and congestion would increase air pollution in a region which is in non-attainment under the Clean Air Act and must continue to meet pollution reduction goals at great cost to area governments and businesses. At the same time, the Fort Belvoir area in particular, is marked by sensitive stream corridors and natural areas which would be harmed by significant new development and road infrastructure, adding to the negative impact on the Chesapeake Bay and the ongoing multi-billion dollar Bay restoration costs faced by federal and state governments.

Additional traffic and inefficiencies would be created by increasing the distance between the Pentagon and numerous supporting offices and staffs. Today many meetings can be conducted between the Pentagon, supporting staffs and contractors via short Metrorail, shuttlebus, and even walking trips between offices. Meetings and some personnel support services would require long highway trips that could consume the better part of a workday.

The cost to state and local government in Virginia and Maryland for new roads and other infrastructure would be significant at a time when federal, state and local transportation budgets are already stretched to the limit.

Proposals by some to extend Metrorail to Fort Belvoir and Fort Meade are appreciated, but this would not be effective. Metro would not connect to a compact job center, leading to inadequate ridership. Offices are too scattered on most military bases and the walking distances from a transit station (especially if outside the gates) would be too long to encourage transit ridership. These new areas also lack fine-grained local road infrastructure, leading to gridlock on arterial roads.

The effect of these locational shifts and the resulting traffic would prompt a loss of personnel at all levels from top-flight researchers to key clerical support staff who may be completely dependent on transit. The moves would have particularly negative effects on the workforces of the District of Columbia and surrounding core jurisdictions.

In sum, we believe that the three criteria: “economic impact” on communities, the “ability of the infrastructure” to support these forces, and the “environmental impact,” would not be met due to the traffic, transportation costs, and pollution costs of these proposed relocations. We also believe that two criteria: “operational readiness” and “manpower,” would not be met as the disruption of the move, the traffic and commuting challenges to the new locations, and the distance from the Pentagon would prompt large losses of manpower and increased inefficiencies.

Therefore, we urge the Department of Defense and regional agencies to find innovative design solutions to security threats, so that defense facilities can remain within walking distance of transit, and near to services. We ask that the Commission not approve proposals to move defense agencies away from efficient Metro station locations. Thank you.

Stewart Schwartz
Executive Director
Coalition for Smarter Growth


 
Coalition for Smarter Growth
4000 Albemarle St, NW, Suite 310
Washington, DC 20016
(202) 244-4408    (202) 244-4438 fax

www.smartergrowth.net

© 1999-2005 Coalition for Smarter Growth. All Rights Reserved.