Click here to watch our Active Transportation Webinar on updates from the 2020 Virginia Legislative session. The event was cosponsored by Fairfax Alliance for Better Bicycling, the City of Fairfax, Fairfax County, and George Mason University’s Department of Parking and Transportation.
Author: Emily Maurer
CSG Comments on the Draft Regional Transit Plan for Central Maryland
Thursday, June 18th, 2020
Maryland Transit Administration & Regional Transit Plan Commission
6 St. Paul St.
Baltimore, MD 21202-1614
Re: Comments from Thirty Organizations on the Draft Regional Transit Plan for Central Maryland
Dear Maryland Transit Administrator Kevin Quinn and the Regional Transit Plan Commission,
Thank you for your leadership in the process to create a Regional Transit Plan that is vital to residents in the region. Public transit will always be a necessary service that keeps health care and other vital systems running both during a global pandemic and in the absence of one. The COVID-19 crisis has further reinforced that we need to make structural changes to our public transit system to address inequities and ensure that everyone has access to the important places in their communities. The Regional Transit Plan can address these deficiencies and can also serve as a critical tool to employ in the economic recovery of the region by both creating jobs and allowing people to get to jobs. Every $1 billion invested in transit supports and creates over 50,000 jobs. While the Draft Regional Transit Plan’s overarching goals are well-chosen, the plan should be improved to significantly address inequities that disproportionately impact people of color, people with disabilities and other marginalized communities and to set a higher bar to improve access, reliability, and protect our environment.
We, undersigned groups encourage you to strengthen this important plan by enacting the following measures:
- Improve access to frequent transit connected to employment centers for marginalized communities and reduce the number of disconnected communities. Everyone deserves to be able to travel to the places where they live, work, and play. Everyday, communities of color have disproportionately less access to critical destinations due to redlining and structural racism. The neighborhoods in Baltimore with the highest percentage of people traveling more than 45 minutes to get to work and also taking transit are predominantly Black communities. The plan should provide strategies and targets to substantially increase access to frequent transit service for communities of color and other marginalized communities to connect to employment centers. The plan should also reduce the census blocks with disconnected communities–communities where there is over 5% unemployment and over 20% of workers are commuting over 45 minutes to get to work.
- Improve the reliability and accessibility of transit for people with disabilities. Our public transit system must work for everyone. People with disabilities are disproportionately impacted by inadequate transit. The plan should significantly increase On Time Performance of Paratrasit and upgrade the percentage of stops and stations that are ADA accessible at a much faster pace than 25% every 10 years. The plan should also include strategies that provide users with better notification systems of vehicle arrival times and provide an analysis of the number of vehicles needed. It is important that the plan include measures to increase the number of wheelchair accessible vehicles and provide special funding for transit services for health care.
- All bus replacements should be for zero emission buses starting in 2024. We need to travel in ways that keep us and our planet healthy. Most of our buses run on diesel fuel that spew out pollution that makes us sick and exacerbates climate disruption. The plan should include a target and strategies that lead to the full transition to a zero-emission transit fleet by requiring that in 2024, all bus replacements be for zero emission buses. Each zero-emission bus reduces pollution as much as taking 27 cars off the road. This goal is achievable, needed to protect public health, and consistent with the goals of comparable jurisdictions. New York City is transitioning 100% of their fleet to electric by 2040.
- Provide faster service to reduce people’s commute times. If people are spending less time traveling each day, they can spend more time with their loved ones. If people can get from point A to B faster on public transit, they will use it more. Currently, people can reach fewer than 1 in 10 jobs in the Greater Baltimore region in less than 45 minutes on transit. While the draft plan recognizes that faster service is important, it does not offer concrete targets. The plan should set targets to substantially reduce peoples’ commute times.
- Provide concrete strategies to pay for the plan. Investing in public transit benefits communities across the region. If we want to see the benefits in the plan, we need to fund them. The plan should develop concrete strategies for identifying federal, state, and local funding and leveraging funding to meet the needs of the plan, with an emphasis on funding strategies in the next 5 years.
- The plan should have consistent short-and long-term goals for improving transit and details of what transit improvements will occur in early priority corridors. The plan should provide 5-year and 25-year targets for each objective: providing faster, more reliable service; growing ridership; increasing access to jobs and opportunities; improving the customer experience; being more equitable; and preparing for the future. MTA should include assessments on how strategies under these objectives will slow the growth of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the region and explain how the corresponding decline in greenhouse gas emissions aligns with the Administration’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Act Plan. The draft plan does not offer consistent metrics; instead it uses different baselines and target years for different indicators. MTA should provide a baseline of current conditions so the public can understand how the conditions are being improved and so that improvements can be reliably monitored and measured. The plan should also outline what transit improvements will occur in early priority corridors identified in the plan and outline the corridors that MTA will study.
Thank you for your consideration of these proposed improvements. Please note the improvements outlined in this letter are by no means exhaustive but outline some of the key measures that should be improved.
Sincerely,
Niamh McQuillan, Co-Lead, 350 Baltimore and Climate Reality Project Baltimore
Klaus Philipsen, FAIA, ArchPlan
Liz Cornish, Executive Director, Bikemore
Nanci Wilkinson, Chair, Environmental Justice Ministry, Cedar Lane Unitarian Universalist Church
Steven Hershkowitz, Maryland Director, Chesapeake Climate Action Network
Gwen L. DuBois MD, MPH President, Chesapeake Physicians for Social Responsibility
Emily Ranson, Maryland Director, Clean Water Action
Jane Lyons, Maryland Advocacy Manager, Coalition for Smarter Growth
Floyd Hartley, Chair, CARS (Consumers for Accessible Ride Services)
Donald M. Goldberg, Executive Director, Climate Law & Policy Project
Eric Norton, Director of Policy & Programs, Central Maryland Transportation Alliance
Robin Murphy, Executive Director, Disability Rights Maryland
Lore Rosenthal, Program Coordinator, Greenbelt Climate Action Network
Liz Feighner, Hoco Climate Action
Richard Deutschmann, Climate Action Team Lead, IndivisibleHoCoMD
Joe Uehlein, President, Labor Network For Sustainability
Richard Willson & Lois Hybl, Co-presidents, League of Women Voters of Maryland
Henry Bogdan, Policy Director, Maryland Nonprofits
Rachel London, Esq., Executive Director, Maryland Developmental Disabilities Council
Kim Coble, Executive Director, Maryland League of Conservation Voters
Cecilia Plante, Co-Chair, Maryland Legislative Coalition
Josh Tulkin, Director, Maryland Sierra Club
Ronza Othman, President, National Federation of the Blind of Maryland
Timothy Judson, Executive Director, Nuclear Information and Resource Service
Cheryl Barnds, Rapid Shift
Mark Southerland, Ph.D.Legislative Director, Safe Skies Maryland
Diana Younts, Takoma Park Mobilization Environment Committee
Tafadzwa (Taffy) Gwitira, Founder and farmer, Tele Farm
Jimmy Rouse, Co-Founder, Transit Choices
W. Phil Webster, Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry of Maryland
CSG Testimony Re: Subdivision Staging Policy
June 5, 2020
Montgomery Planning Board
8787 Georgia Ave
Silver Spring, MD 20910
2020-2024 Subdivision Staging Policy (Item 7)
Testimony for June 11, 2020
Jane Lyons, Maryland Advocacy Manager
Chair Anderson and Planning Commissioners, thank you for the opportunity to testify. This testimony is on behalf of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, the leading organization in the DC region advocating for more walkable, inclusive, transit-oriented communities. Please see below for our comments on the 2020-2024 Subdivision Staging Policy (SSP) working draft. Generally, we urge you to support policies that encourage sustainable growth patterns and maintaining a high-quality school system.
Schools & Taxes:
1. We strongly support the elimination of automatic housing moratoria throughout most of the county. The staff recommendation to create School Impact Areas correctly takes into consideration the distinct development contexts of different areas and how those contexts impact school enrollment growth.
The current moratorium policy assumes that the majority of new student generation comes from new development. However, we now know from the data that stopping development does not actually solve school overcrowding – less than 30 percent of school enrollment growth can be attributed to new development. Most new students come from young families moving into existing single-family homes – not from new apartment buildings.
The working draft also correctly identifies the other negative impacts of the current housing moratorium policy, including worsening housing affordability, hindering economic development, and preventing sustainable growth patterns. Rather than locating in a transit-oriented neighborhood, households and businesses alike are pushed into less desirable areas for growth. We should do all we can to encourage new housing in major transit and job hubs, not ban it – especially during a recession.
2. We support reducing the school impact tax to 100 percent of the cost of a seat, maintaining the current rate at 120 percent in the Agricultural Reserve, and further lowering the rate to 60 percent in Activity Centers. This recommendation correctly recognizes that impact taxes are a tool to either incentivize or disincentivize economic development. In some cases, it may be worth lowering impact taxes in order to expand the overall, long-term tax base and promote growth in the places we want to see it. Although, we’d like to note that some of the identified Activity Centers in outer areas lack transit and are overly large.
Montgomery County has one of the highest school impact taxes in the region. Even at this comparatively high rate, school impact fees only funded approximately 8 percent of the Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) capital budget in both FY19 and FY20. For FY21, impact taxes are only 6 percent of the MCPS capital budget, while recordation taxes fund nearly 24 percent of the budget. In short, reducing the school impact tax for areas where we desire growth will not make or break the MCPS capital budget, but impact taxes do play a significant role in whether new home projects pencil out. Even if a project can move forward at the existing tax rate, the increased cost is ultimately passed onto buyers through higher housing prices.
3. We are concerned by the proposed Utilization Premium Payments.
We should not charge developers for impacts not caused by their project. If a school is already overcrowded, it is because of past student enrollment growth and points to a larger funding failure within the county to raise and allocate enough resources to adequately fund schools’ capital needs. A future project will add to the overutilization, which is why future projects should contribute to the school impact fee pool to fund the seats of any students that project generates.
This recommendation will not build schools, just as the past School Facility Fees provided marginal funding at best – Utilization Premium Payments will only deter economic development. However, we would support increasing the school impact tax from 60 percent to 100 percent for projects located in Activity Centers with overcrowded schools.
4. We support progressive increases to the recordation tax.
While we do not think the Utilization Premium Payments have a strong nexus, the recordation tax does. Since over 70 percent of new students come from neighborhood turnover and recordation taxes account for nearly a quarter of the MCPS capital budget, it makes sense to target home purchases to fund school capacity projects.
We especially support an increase that is progressive, thus raising prices more on homes over $1.5 million, with an expansion of the first-time homebuyer exemption. Staff estimates that these changes would have raised roughly $20 million more for school construction in FY19. Nevertheless, if increasing the recordation tax is not feasible, we recommend instead adjusting the distribution of the revenue to increase the share going to schools and affordable housing.
5. We oppose ending the impact tax exemption for downtown Silver Spring.
As previously stated, impact taxes are a tool to either incentivize or disincentivize economic development, and it’s important to consider the short-term tradeoffs for longer term benefits. The Silver Spring impact tax exemption is a perfect example of this: between 2006 and 2016, the exemption only cost the county $5.8 million. Although Silver Spring is the only Enterprise Zone to successfully graduate from the program, its future success is far from guaranteed, especially in the current difficult economic environment.
A few things that weren’t mentioned: The working draft does not reference the capacity relief that boundary changes would bring system-wide, reducing the need for some expensive capital projects. Utilization is one of the three factors being examined by the current boundary analysis. We also urge the staff to make note of the effect that flexible school siting and creative project financing techniques could bring on the MCPS capital budget.
We recognize that these recommendations fall under the jurisdiction of MCPS and the Board of Education, not the SSP. Still, we believe those ideas warrant mentioning. Furthermore, it is apparent that there needs to
be a better dialogue between MCPS, the Board of Education, Planning Board, and the County Council. Schools issues are greatly interconnected with housing, health, transportation, and more, and should be treated as such by the county’s various institutions.
Transportation:
We appreciate and strongly support the move to better incorporate Vision Zero into the Subdivision Staging Policy, as well as the recommendation to increase intersection delay standards along Purple Line and BRT corridors. This small adjustment would save lives and support walkability around these future transit nodes.
We understand the objective to look at policy area transportation impacts for Master Plans, but are unsure why this should require a mandate within the SSP. If this recommendation moves forward, we believe that there should be higher standards than the baseline requirements to help us work towards our mode share, climate, and congestion goals. For example, we should set more equal standards for average time per trip. 19 minutes for auto trips and 52 minutes for transit encapsulates the transit inequities ingrained into our land use and transportation planning. We must do better.
Thank you for your consideration.
Open Streets Letter to Montgomery County Officials
May 9, 2020
To: The Honorable Marc Elrich
Montgomery County Executive
101 Monroe Street, 2nd Floor
Rockville, MD 20850
Mr. Michael Riley, Director
Montgomery County Department of Parks
9500 Brunett Avenue
Silver Spring, MD 20901
Re: Opening Streets to Pedestrians/Cyclists and Closing them to Vehicles
Executive Elrich, Mr. Riley and Members of Council:
We would first like to express our gratitude for the County’s recent opening of some streets within its parks system to pedestrians/cyclists and to close those road segments to cars. We urge you to consider expanding this “open streets” concept to address the needs of citizens during the COVID-19 lockdown.
We appreciate how hard it is to manage public spaces during the recent global pandemic. Around the world, park managers and elected officials have struggled to find the right balance between public access to open space and public health and safety concerns. We welcome Montgomery Parks’s decision to open parts of Sligo Creek Parkway, Beach Drive and Little Falls Parkway to people on foot and bicycles during April of this year. Exercise is essential to maintain a strong immune system, and many people lack a yard or outdoor private space where they can run and play or bike. It is also essential for people to get sunshine, Vitamin D, fresh air and a change of scenery. Getting out of one’s home, especially if one’s living space is small, is also vital for mental health.
In the weeks since those park-adjacent streets were opened to people three days a week, the public has generally followed public health recommendations and used the extra space to spread out from one another and stay six feet apart. We also note that response to the street openings has been overwhelmingly positive.
Given that COVID-19 and its related social distancing may be with us for a prolonged period, we would like to ask that the county expand the open streets concept.
Specifically, we would like to ask for the following:
1) That the Montgomery County Parks Department to confirm that the three roads will continue to be open to non-vehicular traffic for the duration of the pandemic. The original announcement was only for April.
2) Allow for more hours of open street time each week. Currently, those are open to pedestrians and cyclists each Friday through Sunday from 9am-6pm. We request that they be open all day, seven days a week during the pandemic
3) That the entire length of Sligo Creek Parkway – from New Hampshire Avenue to University Avenue – be open for non-vehicular traffic on the open street days. We would also like to have Beach evaluated for a longer span of closure. Currently there are gaps in the closures, even on “closed” weekend days, despite the fact that adjacent neighborhoods can be accessed from other entrance points/arteries. This should not be a concern given the lockdown dictates that no one should be driving unless it is deemed essential.
4) We understand that the Montgomery County Department of Transportation (DOT) and Montgomery County Park and Planning Commission (MNCPPC) is currently evaluating closing to through traffic some of the designated “Neighborhood Greenways” as listed in the county’s Bicycle Master Plan. These closures to vehicles could be part of a special event, one that connects several neighborhoods as a long, one-day-only walk or ride that would still honor social distancing but provide people with a way to exercise safely, away from high speed traffic. Or, closures could be done on some regularly scheduled basis, such as once a month or each Sunday during COVID lockdown.
4) DOT and MCPPC should consider “hybrid” solutions to meeting the need of the public not near any of the larger parkways currently being closed off. These solutions would provide for more access to the outdoors so that social distancing during exercising, as well as social interaction are feasible for all. In the time of COVID we all want to discourage congregating, but neighborhoods could ask to have some streets made into bike and pedestrian-only routes for exercise with social distancing. Permits could be applied for, and citizens would be the ones to close off the streets during particular days and hours, just as they do during block parties.
We appreciate your time and consideration of these requests and look forward to working with you on implementing workable scenarios that will help residents in the most crowded parts of the county stay healthy during COVID lockdown.
Sincerely,
Paul Goldman, President, Action Committee for Transit
Jane Lyons, Maryland Advocacy Manager, Coalition for Smarter Growth
Alison Gillespie, President, Forest Estates Community Association
Kristy Daphnis, Chair, Pedestrian Bicycle Traffic Safety Advisory Committee
Peter Gray, Vice President, Board of Directors, Washington Area Bicyclist Association
cc: Montgomery County Council
Open Streets Letter to MD SHA
May 20, 2020
To: Greg Slater
Maryland Secretary of Transportation
7201 Corporate Center Drive
Hanover, Maryland 21076
Mr. Tim Smith, Administrator
Maryland State Highway Administration
707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, MD 21202
Re: Opening Streets to Pedestrians/Cyclists and Closing them to Vehicles
Secretary Slater and Administrator Smith:
We urge you to consider implementing an “open streets” concept under which SHA would partially close certain State Roads to address the needs of citizens during the COVID-19 lockdown. This concept was noted in an April 8, 2020 Q&A session with Secretary Slater and Maryland Advocates For Sustainable Transportation . In that session, Secretary Slater acknowledged the possibility of an “open streets” implementation on some State roads as long as the neighboring households and businesses were consulted.
We appreciate how hard it is to manage public spaces during the recent global pandemic. Around the world, state agency managers and elected officials have struggled to find the right balance between public access to open space and public health and safety concerns. Such strategies have been implemented in Bogata, Columbia; Paris, France; Oakland, CA; and other places around the World. Closer to home, in Maryland, we applaud Montgomery Parks’s decision to open parts of Sligo Creek Parkway, Beach Drive and Little Falls Parkway to people on foot and bicycles during April of this year.
Exercise is essential to maintain a strong immune system, and many people lack a yard or outdoor private space where they can run and play or bike. It is also essential for people to get sunshine, Vitamin D, fresh air and a change of scenery. Getting out of one’s home, especially if one’s living space is small, is also vital for mental health. Additionally, having such safe space on our State roads for using alternatives to cars in order to do shorter trips (under 3 miles in length) to work and other essential trips, is also vital. It therefore is critical that the creation of such space be done on an equitable basis in which streets are chosen that will serve all communities, particularly lower income and more diverse communities. We also note that the response to the street openings has been overwhelmingly positive.
Given that COVID-19 and its related social distancing may be with us for a prolonged period, we would like to ask that the State Highway Administration engage in implementing the open streets concept.
Specifically, we would like to ask for the following:
1) MD SHA, in cooperation with County/Municipal departments of transportation draw up a list of State roads which would be eligible for partial closures of car traffic lanes for use by pedestrians and bicyclists.
2) After drawing up such a list, MD SHA move to implement such lane closures, perhaps with a small number of pilot roads designated, with a larger number being designated for such lane closures and implementation of those plans.
We appreciate your time and consideration of these requests and look forward to working with you on implementing workable scenarios that will help residents in the State stay healthy during the COVID lockdown.
Sincerely,
Paul Goldman, President, Action Committee for Transit
Jane Lyons, Maryland Advocacy Manager, Coalition for Smarter Growth
Alison Gillespie, President, Forest Estates Community Association
Kristy Daphnis, Chair, Pedestrian Bicycle Traffic Safety Advisory Committee
Peter Gray, Vice President, Board of Directors Washington Area Bicyclist Association
cc: Chris Conklin, MCDOT
Marc Korman, Maryland State Delegate
Jared Solomon, Maryland State Delegate
Marc Elrich, Montgomery County Executive
Montgomery County Council
Letter to MDOT on Purple Line Negotiations
Secretary Greg Slater
Harry R. Hughes Department of Transportation Building
7201 Corporate Center Drive Hanover, MD 21076
May 20, 2020
Re: State Negotiations with Purple Line Transit Constructors (PLTC)
Dear Secretary Slater:
Thank you for your and the State’s dedication to the Purple Line light rail project. The Purple Line is a transformational project that will bring increased economic opportunity to Maryland residents in the DC region. The State’s continued support is vital for the project to be completed in a timely and financially responsible manner.
The Coalition for Smarter Growth is extremely concerned by Purple Line Transit Constructors’ (PLTC) threat to walk away from the project due to delays and cost overruns. We take no position on the dispute, but strongly urge you to quickly come to an agreement that prioritizes a timely completion of the Purple Line.
The project is already a year behind schedule due to many factors, including some that have now been resolved. However, failing to negotiate an agreement and having to find a new construction team will undoubtedly result in even more delays and costs. The state should explore all of its options to ground negotiations in realistic cost and time expectations, with a high-level negotiator empowered to make a deal to keep the Purple Line on track. To remain true to its public commitment to the Purple Line, Maryland must take action.
We also recognize that this is a particularly difficult time for transit and we appreciate the steps the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) has taken to protect transit operators and riders. Transit, including the Purple Line, will be a key part of our post-COVID-19 economic recovery and growing Maryland with less congestion, safer roadways, and cleaner air.
In conclusion, we urge the State to do all it can to negotiate an agreement that keeps the Purple Line’s construction on track. The Purple Line remains of great value for the over 230,000 Marylanders who live along the corridor, and public investment in this project will be repaid many times over by the economic activity it supports. Thank you for your work on this important project.
Signed,
Stewart Schwartz Executive Director
CC: Governor Larry Hogan
Maryland Transit Administrator Kevin B. Quinn, Jr.
Purple Line Transit Partners
County Executive Marc Elrich
County Executive Angela Alsobrooks
Montgomery County Council
Prince George’s County Council
CSG Testimony Regarding the DTSS Master Plan Boundary
Chair Anderson and Planning Commissioners, thank you for the opportunity to testify. I am speaking on behalf of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, the leading organization in the DC region advocating for more walkable, inclusive, transit-oriented communities. We support expanding the boundary of the Silver Spring Downtown Plan, in line with option D.
STATEMENT: Call to Action for Local Officials on Equity and Sustainability
For immediate release
May 14, 2020
Contact: Stewart Schwartz | 703-599-6437 (cell)
Cheryl Cort | 202-251-7516 (cell)
A call to action for sustainable and equitable communities in the wake of COVID-19
The COVID-19 crisis has exposed long-standing inequities and highlights the need and opportunities for fundamental reforms. The saying, “never waste a crisis,” is true and we urge our elected officials, government staff – all of us — to work together and take-action now to address the following 10 priorities:
1) Provide living wages and health protection for essential workers – people who work in public safety, health care, transit, grocery stores and the food supply network, pharmacies, trash collection, teachers, day care and elder care, and a range of other occupations are our essential workers, and should be paid a living wage and provided the health protection and security they need.
2) Provide affordable housing and a real economic safety net – far too many people live day-to-day with no margin of safety and need a living wage and rental assistance; affordable, clean, and secure homes; health care; day care; affordable transit; and the opportunity to save and climb the economic ladder.
3) Provide equitable access to health care and healthy environments – far too many people lack access to good health care and need nearby and equitable access to primary care and specialists, fresh healthy food, parks and recreation, safe places to walk and bike, and clean air and water.
4) Address racial disparities now – the racial disparities in COVID-19 illness and death, and in access to health care, job losses, share of workers in essential services with exposure risks, exposure to air pollution from highways, and risk of eviction and homelessness have never been more starkly exposed and must be addressed with the equivalent of a Marshall Plan.
5) Slash air pollution – air pollution has long contributed to respiratory and cardiac illness and has recently been found to contribute to higher levels of COVID-19 illness. We are seeing dramatic drops in air pollution due to the big decline in driving, with clear blue skies across the world, and should not waste this opportunity to slash air pollution from cars, trucks, and industry.
6) Slash greenhouse gas emissions – similar to other pollution, emissions of CO2 during stay-at-home orders have plunged — to 1995 levels. Oil demand has also declined 30% to 1995 levels. The health and economic causes of the decline are absolutely nothing to cheer, but the decline reminds us of the imperative and the opportunity to rapidly shift to renewable energy and electric vehicles, green buildings, and reduced driving through transit and walkable communities. Moreover, the societal and economic disruption of the pandemic illustrates why we must head off the disruption that would come from uncontrolled climate change – in which a warmer planet will fuel more disease pandemics along with rising sea levels, flooding, droughts, fires, and human dislocation.
7) Provide streets for people – the disappearance of traffic on city and suburban streets, the booming demand to walk and bike, and the lack of enough safe space for walking and bicycling, starkly illustrates how much of our public space is consumed by cars. We have a unique opportunity to widen sidewalks, and install protected bicycle lanes and dedicated bus lanes, creating more livable communities with fewer cars, and reduced air and noise pollution.
8) Expand parks and open space – we are learning how important it is to have nearby parks and greenways for our health and well-being, and that too many people lack parks and trails that they can safely walk to. We need to expand our park, greenway and trail networks as part of walkable, sustainable communities.
9) Save, restore, and expand transit – Transit, especially our buses, has been critical during COVID-19 to getting health care and other essential workers to their jobs. We’ve seen that transit is truly an essential public service. We need personal protection for transit drivers and riders, and enhanced, frequent cleaning. Looking ahead, the economic recovery of our cities and our metropolitan region will depend on the restoration of transit – which supports growth with less traffic and pollution. We will also need expanded transit to fight climate change. We must prioritize funding for transit, dedicated bus lanes and network redesigns for frequent, reliable service, and expanded access to transit for those most in need.
10) Invest in urban placemaking – The past two decades have seen a boom in our cities, towns and urbanizing suburban communities because of the economic, social, creative, health, and environmental benefits, including fighting climate change. Contrary to the charges of those who advocate against cities, what we are facing now is a health crisis and a failure to plan and act to stem a pandemic, not a failure of walkable urban places. We are social creatures and coming together has been key to the progress of civilization, innovation, the arts, and society. Looking ahead we must continue to invest in urban places while addressing the areas where we have fallen short, in affordable housing, equitable access to health care, healthy food, parks and safe streets, and in frequent, reliable and affordable public transit.
In summary, we call on our leaders to place top priority in the following areas for social and economic equity, opportunity, and action:
- Racial and social equity
- Affordable housing
- Tenant protection
- Living wages
- Worker safety
- Health care
- Healthy food
- Day care and elder care
- Education and teachers
- Safe streets
- Parks, greenways and trails
- Transit
- Clean air and clean water
- Climate change
- Walkable, inclusive, transit-oriented urban places
###