Category: Testimony & Letters

MD Comments: Draft Go Prince George’s

August 13, 2025

Ms. Lakisha Hull
Director, Prince George’s County Planning Department
Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission
Wayne K. Curry Administration Building
1301 McCormick Drive, Largo MD                             via: gopgc@mncppc.org

Dear Director Hull:

Thank you for your active engagement with the public on the preparation of Go Prince George’s. We wish to provide some initial comments on the draft Go Prince George’s in advance of its formal consideration. First, we wish to express our overall enthusiastic support for the greatly revised Master Plan for Transportation, a welcome move towards a multimodal, complete streets approach to transportation. Here are some highlights of exciting elements of the draft plan: 

  1. Urban Street Design Standards are integrated into Functional Classification of roadways — this is a crucial guide for how road engineers decide how to design a road. This is an important advance to achieving full implementation. 
  2. Urban Street Design Standards are applied to both designated regional and local centers streets, and beyond. We strongly support this approach.
  3. Road diets – roads downsized from 6-8 lanes to 2-4 lanes, per Urban Street Design Standards. This is a major advance for fostering safer streets, connected communities, and economic development. Right-sizing these roads are essential to attracting transit-oriented development, such as along the Central Ave./Blue Line corridor. 
  4. Bicycle facilities are fully integrated into each road designation – this is a significant improvement. Example: Facility Recommendations (section 3).
  5. Bus priority (Transit policy – Policy TR) policy and cross-sections are included, along with 5 high capacity routes identified. Bus priority, however, is not consistently mentioned in section 3. Bus lanes are identified for MD 458 for example which we support, but not for MD 410.

Recommendations for improvements:

  1. Eliminate Vehicle LOS (level of service) for Local and Regional Centers, and other appropriate areas. We recommend the following language:

Policy RH 4: Eliminate vehicular LOS requirements within all Local and Regional Centers. This strategy amends Table 21 of Plan 2035, applicable recommendations of the 2009 Countywide Master Plan of Transportation, and the Transportation Review Guidelines.

The above proposed language will replace the draft’s vague policy – “Policy RH 4: Establish realistic and appropriate traffic level-of-service (LOS) standards for the determination of adequacy of roads and highways within a first-tier suburb.” 

Our Policy RH 4 recommendation is taken from the West Hyattsville-Queen Chapel Sector Plan, which states:  “TM 1.17. Eliminate vehicular LOS requirements within the West Hyattsville Local Transit Center. This strategy amends Table 21 of Plan 2035, applicable recommendations of the 2009 Countywide Master Plan of Transportation, and the Transportation Review Guidelines.”

This recommendation was also suggested in a draft of the West Hyattsville plan to be considered for application within all Regional Transit Districts and Local Centers. We agree.

  1. Add intersection design guidance as a separate strategy. We appreciate the many mentions of intersection features as important to complete streets, and in notes for specific facilities. However, a policy or strategy devoted to the complexity of intersection design would help advance many of the plan’s goals. Intersections are the most challenging aspect of street design in an urban environment, thus warrant specific attention. 

Regarding “Policy CG 7 Regularly refine and update the County’s adopted Urban Street Design Standards to reflect best street design practices.” We recommend the following additional strategy:

Strategy CG 7.4 Work with DPW&T and MDOT to identify and establish best practices for intersection design guidance.

  1. Design speed of 20-25 mph for Urban Streets should be cited as a specific goal and receive explicit attention. We ask the plan state 20-25 mph design speed be used as a key metric to guide roadway design decisions. Design speed is not mentioned in the draft, even though it states “Intended Functional Operating Speed: (20-25 mph)” and maximum speed limit of 20 or 25 mph. Solving for a 20-25 mph street as an overarching goal provides a framework that is more comprehensive than listing individual tools and practices that help reduce vehicle speeds to intended speeds. 
  2. Use vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per household as a key measure for development review. The draft cites the Plan 2035 identification of VMT as an important measure, but the draft makes no mention of using vehicle miles travel as a part of the development review process to assess the traffic and pollution impacts of each project. Using VMT per household helps create understanding of traffic network impacts, location efficiency, and mitigation needs. CSG has done this kind of analysis here and here. Scoring each new development for its VMT per household performance will help identify developments most beneficial to the county, the transportation network, and the environment. It will also call attention to mitigation needs for less location-efficient projects. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely,

Cheryl Cort

Policy Director

Recommendations to ensure an RFK stadium deal benefits DC, provides affordable housing and sustainable transportation options

Our organization advocates for walkable, bikeable, inclusive, and transit-oriented communities as the most sustainable and equitable way for the Washington, DC region to grow and provide opportunities for all.

We have been working in the District of Columbia for over 28 years. We have been reviewing the proposal and were drafting this letter highlighting our concerns and recommendations when the news came out today that Chair Mendelson has the outlines of an improved deal. Without having the details of Chair Mendelson’s proposal before us, we will share the following in the hope that we can achieve the best deal possible for the District and its residents.

Prioritize an inclusive, vibrant community at RFK – with or without a stadium

CSG urges the District to prioritize the creation of an inclusive, vibrant community on the RFK Stadium site, including housing options for all, sustainable transportation choices, and community amenities – whether or not there is a professional sports stadium incorporated into the development. 

The administration’s proposal gives away too much, exaggerates economic benefits

Mayor Bowser’s proposed stadium and site development agreement with the Washington Commanders would give unprecedented public subsidies, control of development rights, and tax revenues away to the team. We appreciate the work of Chair Mendelson to reach agreement on an amended deal that directs some revenues and development control back to DC. CSG agrees that a regional sports stadium should be located in an accessible site with good public transit, walking and biking access and that the RFK site can fulfill those prerequisites; however, local and state governments also need to be good stewards of public land and funds. 

Incorporate these critical elements as a modified stadium agreement is considered: 

We ask the DC Council to incorporate these elements to ensure that a deal benefits DC residents and supports adopted District housing, planning and transportation goals:

  1. Ensure housing is built without delay in the Riverfront and Plaza Districts where the team has development rights
    • Establish controls, milestones, and clawbacks to ensure housing, affordable housing and supportive neighborhood retail and services are built in a timely manner.
    • We are glad to see that the amended agreement by Chair Mendelson includes deadlines for completion of nonstadium uses with penalties. We look forward to seeing more details on this and hope that it ensures timely housing and mixed-use development.
    • The Mayor’s deal did not provide any guarantees that the sports team will develop the adjacent sites for mixed-use development that supports city goals. Under that agreement, the Commanders could indefinitely use these as “temporary” surface parking.
  2. Require all residential development at the site follow the affordable housing requirements of DC’s public land disposition law
    • These include a 30% set aside of affordable housing at 30% and 50% median family income (MFI) for rental, and 80% MFI for ownership units in perpetuity (Code of the District of Columbia § 10–801), leveraging the land value as the first source of subsidy.
    • Land should be leased with covenants for affordability requirements.
  3. Replace parking subsidies with expanded public transit, walking and biking
    • The District of Columbia would spend over $350 million to build the largest parking garages in the city under the current deal, structures that would loom over the Kingman Park neighborhood.
    • Most of these funds should instead be used to improve transit, walking and biking access to and within the new neighborhood and stadium.
    • Specific improvements should include:
      • Metrorail station and service improvements. 
      • Bus priority lanes on H Street NE.
      • Improved pedestrian and bicycle facilities on the Benning and East Capital Street bridges to improve access from areas east of the river. 
    • We appreciate the redirection of $600M from the sports facility fee to upgrading the Stadium-Armory Station – and we believe that the District could gain greater savings – and needed investment in its public transportation system – by not subsidizing parking garages that will largely sit empty most of the year.
  4. Redirect more public revenues back to the District through revenue sharing agreement
    • We appreciate Chair Mendelson’s negotiation for some shares of revenues to come back to DC. But we think that the District can do better than receiving $779M spread out over 30 years given the large total subsidy. More revenue should be shared with the District beginning right after the first $500 million in debt is paid off.
  5. Require a strong performance-based Transportation Demand Management Plan
    • The TDM plan should include performance-based metrics to shift more trips to transit, walking, and biking, consistent with the targets of the District’s adopted MoveDC plan.
  1. Protect and improve public recreation access and community amenities 
    • Protect and ensure the continuation of existing community recreational and other uses on the RFK site, both during construction and after. These include parks, recreation, and sports facilities as well as uses such as the farmers market.
    • Expand The Fields recreation facilities, building on their high demand. 
    • Per the Comprehensive Plan, improvements should include the creation and maintenance of a pedestrian and cyclist shoreline access path and well-designed public spaces.

We urge the Council to ensure that DC residents will benefit from an RFK development plan and commitments that include housing options for all, sustainable transportation choices, and community amenities – whether or not there is a professional sports stadium incorporated into the development. 

In-Person Testimony: 495 Southside Study

In-Person Testimony: 495 Southside Study

From the beginning the VDOT study has been fatally flawed by a conclusions-first approach – defining their purpose and need as “extending express toll lanes” which forecloses other alternatives. Moreover, they have not provided all the information necessary for an informed decision – particularly the traffic impact on connecting roads. Given the missing information and strong concerns expressed by Fairfax, Prince George’s, Alexandria, Charles, WMATA, and state legislators in Virginia and Maryland, this project is not ready for inclusion in the regional plan.

Testimony: Support for Z.C. Case No. 13-14E, modification to Parcels 2 and 4 (Reservoir District formerly known as McMillan)  (DC)

Testimony: Support for Z.C. Case No. 13-14E, modification to Parcels 2 and 4 (Reservoir District formerly known as McMillan) (DC)

July 17, 2025

Mr. Anthony Hood

Chairman, Zoning Commission of the District of Columbia

441 4th Street, NW, Suite 210S

Washington, DC 20001

RE: Support for Z.C. Case No. 13-14E, modification to Parcels 2 and 4 (Reservoir District formerly known as McMillan)

Dear Chairman Hood:

Please accept this testimony on behalf of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. CSG advocates for walkable, bikeable, inclusive, transit-oriented communities as the most sustainable and equitable way for the Washington, DC region to grow and provide opportunities for all.

We wish to express our support for the proposed modifications to this PUD (13-14E) for the Reservoir District to allow for greater flexibility given changing conditions over the decade that this proposal has been waiting to move forward. The changes also include increased affordable housing, and more housing overall. These modifications will help ensure this long sought after project will be able to be completed and fulfill the promise of this major development.

We are pleased to see that the proposal now includes 30% MFI affordable housing — something that we called for in our 2014 testimony. We ask that the affordable units be committed to in perpetuity, which is the standard for public land dispositions under law. I note that Inclusionary Zoning retains the affordable units for the life of the development. Thus either way, DC regulations set a permanent term as the standard for publicly-supported affordable housing. 

The proposed senior units are 39 30% MFI, 86 50% MFI, and 16 60% MFI. We are also pleased to see an increase in affordable senior homes at the site. We remain hopeful that the project will also receive a HANTA program tax abatement to include more 80% MFI units (with a term of 40 years). This will be an important contribution to housing equity for the neighborhood and city.

We support the other modifications and flexibility to secure a grocery store. The proposed changes are within reasonable parameters. We recognize that the commitment of a full scale grocery store like Harris Teeter cannot be necessarily sustained for 10 years, and that the market economics have changed significantly in that time. We are hopeful that the developer can keep the current smaller format grocer commitment for the site. DC has several high quality smaller grocers like Streets that are essentially full service. These kinds of smaller grocery stores are great assets to their communities. 

We hope the plan can continue to retain sufficient ground floor retail uses to animate the street and provide services to residents, along with visitors and workers at the nearby hospitals. The request for lodging makes sense given the world-class hospital and health services across the street. The retail, lodging and public spaces are a way to enhance the hospital district, which is a major center for private employment in DC. 

We, of course, support the proposed reduction in parking — which is still far above what is required. Oversupply of parking is a cost burden. We support enhanced bus service to the site, along with better walk and bike access. 

We note that the Reservoir District is rapidly becoming a reality with a major new park, recreation center, playground, and indoor swimming pool. This was first to deliver, and now the townhouses are coming on line. The preservation of historic structures and integration of these structures into the site and the recreation center stands out as a distinctive feature for the neighborhood. Providing the flexibility to secure the buildout of the hundreds of mixed income homes with ground floor retail, including a grocery store, is needed to realize the promise of this major new neighborhood district. We ask the Zoning Commission to approve this modification without delay. 

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Cort

Policy Director

Testimony: Remove M-83 from County Plans (MoCo Council, July 2025)

Testimony: Remove M-83 from County Plans (MoCo Council, July 2025)

We urge you to adopt the recommendations of the Planning Board and remove the unbuilt northern portion of M-83 from the Master Plan of Highways and Transitways.

M-83 is not the right path forward to provide better transportation options upcounty. The ways of thinking that informed plans for this road decades ago are fundamentally out of step with what we know today about best practices to address transportation needs, and about the vital connections between environmental health, climate resilience, and human health.

Written Recommendations: MoCo’s More Housing N.O.W. Package

Written Recommendations: MoCo’s More Housing N.O.W. Package

Montgomery County has a strong record of supporting subsidized affordable housing, including making historic commitments to funding for affordable housing these past few years.

We have not been innovators in the same way in making sure our county has homes that are affordable to our middle class, young people, older adults looking to downsize, and others who do not qualify for affordable housing—yet are increasingly unable to find market-rate homes they can afford amongst our limited housing options.

In-Person Testimony: MoCo More Housing N.O.W. Package

In-Person Testimony: MoCo More Housing N.O.W. Package

It is a plain and simple fact that our county needs more housing. People want housing that they can afford, and they do not want to have to spend their lives sitting in traffic just to get to work. 

Nothing demonstrates the strong support for these simple ideas more than the broad, diverse coalition that showed up in support of the announcement of the More Housing N.O.W. package.

Testimony: Support for the Flats at Glenridge Station, DSP-23008 & DDS-24002 (Prince George’s)

Testimony: Support for the Flats at Glenridge Station, DSP-23008 & DDS-24002 (Prince George’s)

March 10, 2025

Mr. Peter Shapiro, Chair

Prince George’s County Planning Board, M-NCPPC

1616 McCormick Drive, Largo MD

Via: pgcpb@mncppc.org

RE: Support for the Flats at Glenridge Station, DSP-23008 & DDS-24002

Dear Chair Shapiro and members of the Board:

Please accept this testimony on behalf of the Coalition for Smarter Growth (CSG). CSG advocates for walkable, bikeable, inclusive, transit-oriented communities as the most sustainable and equitable way for the Washington, DC region to grow and provide opportunities for all. We work extensively in suburban Maryland, focused on Prince George’s and Montgomery counties. 

We would like to express our support for the Flats at Glenridge, DSP-23008 & DDS-24002. The proposed 245-apartment building, with a small amount of office space, offers families affordable homes right next to the Glenridge Purple Line station, along with close proximity to retail, including a supermarket. The site is less than a quarter mile from the station and MD 450, and by direct connection would be about 300 feet from the station.

This proposal is the first major step towards implementing the vision for a walkable Glenridge Transit Village outlined in the Annapolis Road Sector Plan. The apartment building offers amenities like a playground and a plaza with landscaping. Most importantly, these 245 homes give moderate and low income families the opportunity to live next to a rail transit station, and local-serving retail. 

This affordable transit-oriented development helps more people rely on sustainable transportation options and reduce the need to drive or own a car. We appreciate the unit mix offering a variety of unit sizes, including many 3-bedroom apartments. 

The project provides important contributions to county and community goals, including:

  • Affordability – the proposal will provide homes affordable at and below 60% of median family income. These are quality, new 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom homes to address residents’ need for low-cost housing. Transit-accessible housing also reduces household transportation costs;
  • Environmentally-friendly location – allowing more families to live here in a compact, walkable environment reduces traffic, pollution and crashes by giving households options to walk and ride transit more, and drive less;
  • Better communities with transit-oriented development – more homes in this location, inside the Beltway and next to rail transit and existing retail, helps to transition this area to the envisioned Glendridge Transit Village where more homes and businesses can be focused in a walkable, transit-oriented environment. A vibrant, walkable Glenridge Transit Village will benefit nearby neighbors who can enjoy better retail options, a more human-scaled environment, and transportation choices.

We recognize that the site is currently wooded, but it is a fragment surrounded by development. Allowing more people to live here, steps away from frequent rail transit at this inside the Beltway location means less driving, traffic and pollution for households who otherwise might have to live elsewhere. Additionally, the project will fund offsite forest conservation to offset trees removed from the site, while providing modern stormwater management onsite to control runoff and water quality. 

We have two recommendations for improving this project:

  1. Securing a direct walk pathway from the building to the Purple Line station entrance. 
  2. Reducing parking and allocating that space and cost savings to other benefits for residents. The large amount of parking — 337 spaces for 245 units is a 1.37 ratio. Development standards reduce by half the required amount due to the site’s proximity to transit.

Conclusion

We urge the Planning Board to approve this application as a major step forward for the Glenridge Transit Village and the benefits it will provide to the larger community and county.

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely,

Cheryl Cort

Policy Director

VA Testimony: Support for AT&T Oakton plan amendment by Fairfax Healthy Communities

February 25, 2025 

Fairfax County Planning Commission

12000 Government Center Parkway

Fairfax, VA 22035

RE: Comments in Support of AT&T Oakton plan amendment – PA 2023-00009 (SSPA 2023-II-1F)

Chairman Niedzielski-Eichner and Commissioners,

The above nine organizations, as part of the Fairfax Healthy Communities Network, are

providing the comments below to express our strong support for the redevelopment of the AT&T Oakton site and ask that you vote in favor of Plan Amendment – PA 2023-00009 (SSPA 2023-II-1F).

Our organizations assess proposed development projects in accordance with our shared principles that they provide more homes for a mix of incomes, are accessible to transit with safe walking and biking options, and provide good environmental sustainability and design. 

Providing more housing for a mix of incomes in walkable, high amenity areas near transit and jobs is essential to ensuring an inclusive and economically prosperous Fairfax County where people are able to live near their work, reducing long commutes and our climate impact. 

The proposed redevelopment of the AT&T site is a great opportunity to do just that on 33 acres in the heart of Oakton, transforming acres of underutilized office space and parking lots into an inclusive, vibrant community. It offers new homes, including affordable units, with access to transit, improved bike/ped connections, enhanced stormwater management, parks, and tree preservation.The redevelopment provides the opportunity for much-needed placemaking within Oakton that will enhance residents’ sense of community. 

The proposed plan amendment is the first step in making way for this redevelopment proposal to become a reality. The plan calls for an appropriate increase in intensity and balanced mix of uses, including grocery and retail, that will support a walkable, vibrant community as the core of the Flint Hill Suburban Center. Appropriate transitions to existing neighborhoods support compatibility and integration with the surrounding area. It includes good urban design with a grid of streets, wide walkways, activated street level activity, parks and open spaces.  

Transportation

The AT&T site is in a prime location near transit services, including the Vienna Metro, local bus service, and express buses running in the I-66 High-Occupancy Toll lanes. It is also served by two major regional multi-use trails, the Gerry Connolly Cross County Trail and the 66 Parallel Trail. 

While the site benefits from proximity to these sustainable transportation options, the area today is not comfortable or inviting for people trying to get around without driving. The proposed redevelopment is an opportunity to help turn that around, improving safety and accessibility for residents and visitors of the site itself, and catalyzing, through the planned area transportation study, improvements for the surrounding community as well.  

We are grateful the draft language includes the needed transportation improvements that will help improve mobility in the area. The plan calls for optimizing transit and enhancing bus stop amenities, improving pedestrian and bicycle connections, adding safer crossing options, including a traffic signal for families to safely cross to Oakton Elementary School. 

The innovative approach to the Chain Bridge and Jermantown intersection will improve driver travel time and provide better infrastructure and safer crossings for people walking and biking without destructive widening with more lanes.  

Housing

More housing in the county is desperately needed. The shortage of homes and high prices mean more and more people cannot afford to live in Fairfax. The proposal to redevelop the AT&T site will deliver 850 new homes in multi-family buildings and townhomes. It includes 18 percent affordable and workplace units, an increase over the policy recommendation of 8 percent. This supports the county’s housing goal of providing 10,000 units by 2034. 

Environment & Parks

We are grateful the draft plan calls for open space, a well-designed and connected urban park, and the preservation of established trees along the perimeter of the property and new native plantings. This supports the redevelopment proposal that includes the addition of a 2-acre park complementing the existing Borge Street Park, a central green common, and a 1-mile shared use path that provides a linear park around the perimeter of the site. Redevelopment will provide updated and enhanced stormwater management, green infrastructure, and stream protection.  

In Summary

This plan amendment supports redevelopment of the AT&T Oakton site, which will provide much needed housing in a walkable community with access to transit and enhanced environmental design and open space. We ask that you approve the plan amendment.    

Thank you for your consideration of our comments. 

Ting Waymouth

Chesapeake Climate Action Network NoVA

Sonya Breehey

Coalition for Smarter Growth

Joy Faunce

Fairfax Alliance for Better Bicycling

Chris Topoleski

Faith Alliance for Climate Solutions

Chris French

Fairfax Families for Safe Streets

Renee Grebe

Nature Forward

Jill Norcross & Anika Rahman

Northern Virginia Affordable Housing Alliance

Kevin O’Brien

Washington Area Bicyclist Association

Naveed Easton, Joshua Booth, Mostafa ElNahass & Evan Ramee

YIMBYs of NOVA