We are pleased to express our support for the revised Development Guidelines for the commercial areas on Connecticut Avenue in the Cleveland Park and Woodley Park Historic Districts. The revised Development Guidelines will help us meet the Comprehensive Plan goals of increasing housing, and improving the mix of uses, while ensuring building forms that integrate with the historic districts and foster a people-friendly streetscape around the Cleveland Park and Woodley Park Metro stations.
Category: Testimony & Letters
CSG Testimony for Connecticut Avenue Development Guidelines
The revised Guidelines will help us meet the Comprehensive Plan goals of increasing housing, and improving the mix of uses, while ensuring building forms that integrate with the historic districts and foster a people-friendly streetscape around the Cleveland Park and Woodley Park Metro stations.

CSG comments on Brookland-CUA Metro station proposed changes to transit facilities
September 22, 2023
by Cheryl Cort, Policy Director, Coalition for Smarter Growth
Please accept this testimony on behalf of the Coalition for Smarter Growth, the leading organization advocating for walkable, bikeable, inclusive, transit-oriented communities as the most sustainable and equitable way for the Washington, DC region to grow and provide opportunities for all.
The suburban-style Brookland Metro station has long been in need of a makeover. At the same time, DC needs more housing and affordable housing, especially around transit hubs. Offering more housing opportunities in this highly accessible location will benefit the many families and individuals who would like to live in a walkable, bike-friendly, transit-accessible neighborhood.
While the proposed changes offer a much better station area than today, given the severe constraints on the development parcels and continued dominance of bus bays, we ask that WMATA further reconsider the site layout to achieve the full potential of this redevelopment.
Currently, much of the east side of the station area is covered in expansive bus bays and a short-term parking lot. The proposed changes can help recreate a more urban, pedestrian-scaled layout and knit the station back into the fabric of the community.
We see the following as positive outcomes of the proposed transit facilities changes:
- Reducing the impervious surface area
- Reconfiguring bus bays into transit streets along an extended Newton Street and 9th Streets
- Creating a more walk-friendly environment with a new street grid
- Reducing the number of Kiss and Ride spaces and relocating the remaining spaces to curbside spaces under the Michigan Avenue bridge, which is already informally used for drop off/pick up due to its proximity to the station entrance
- Maintaining the nine bus bays, and adding new layover space
- Freeing up space for new apartments and retail
Below, we discuss several issues that can help improve the station area as a part of this process.
Rethinking bus bays, transit streets, & bus terminus: The illustration of the reconfigured bus bays shows the sawtooth curb design. We request consideration of a straight curb line, parallel bus bay/stop design for off-street or possibly on-street bus stops. We recognize the major improvement from the vast bus bay island and driveway configuration of today, but we ask that further consideration be given to street and bus facility designs that provide a more comfortable pedestrian environment for people walking and waiting for buses, and how these facilities are integrated into the fabric of the street network.
Given the modest number of bus transfers at the station, we recommend WMATA consider several changes to bus service terminating at Brookland station. We ask that bus routes discharge and pick up passengers near the station entrance, but layover somewhere else. Or instead of terminating at the station, run service on reconfigured streets close to the station entrance. These changes could shrink the amount of space dedicated to bus layovers, and improve the pedestrian environment.
Buildable parcels: We are concerned that the three sites proposed for mixed use development are severely constrained and offer inefficient building layouts that would generate high construction costs, and limited accessibility for loading, deliveries and drop off. We ask WMATA to reconsider the street design, bus facilities and plaza to create a more pedestrian-friendly environment and one that provides more efficient and feasible building footprints.
Public spaces and plazas: We recommend that the project require the inclusion of vibrant, interactive public spaces around the Metro station entrance. The public space should be welcoming for transit riders and offer places for sitting, shade, public art, improved wayfinding, room for vendor kiosks or other close connections between people at the station and convenience retail.
Park amenities and connection to Brooks Mansion (DC owned, occupied by DCTV): The RFP for future development can ask for park amenities for both the preserved greenspace next to the Metro parking lot and the Brooks Mansion grounds (such as benches and climbable art) to be provided and maintained as a part of a larger mixed use development. We ask that WMATA work with the District government to revise the current (underutilized) use of the Brooks Mansion property. The Brooks Mansion should be repurposed as a civic building and accessible public garden, and the fencing removed or modified, and surface parking lots removed. Members of the public have called for preserving and increasing green space at the Metro station. Opening up these large grounds are an ideal use of this open space to meet the desire for additional usable greenspace.
Housing and affordable housing: The site should be reconfigured to maximize the potential for mixed income housing. We know that the joint development needs to pay for the new transit facilities, and then pay for important amenities like affordable housing, public spaces, park furniture, and maintenance. We ask that affordable housing be a top priority. Affordable housing is a critical need and the Inclusionary Zoning set aside is automatically 20% for the parcels zoned PDR, an industrial zone. We think this is a good baseline for the RFP but also support the use of city incentives such as tax abatements to help the project pay for affordable housing, along with other costs.
Bicycle access and facilities: The redevelopment of the station should incorporate enhanced bicycle facilities, including secure bicycle storage, station access, and connections to the Metropolitan Branch Trail.
Bunker Hill Road & 10th intersection: We ask that the Bunker Hill and 10th Street intersection be redesigned to reduce crossing distances for pedestrians and improve safety. We note that no buses appear to be routed to turn right exiting the station on Bunker Hill Road, so reduced crossing distances should not be a conflict with major transit vehicle movements.
A competitive RFP: We encourage WMATA to set up a competitive RFP that leverages the value of the site so that redevelopment can pay for priorities like affordable housing, dynamic public spaces, better bike and walk facilities, and park amenities. To realize these opportunities, we urge WMATA to do further assessment of how to replace bus bays, and bus service at the station, and create feasible development parcels for housing or mixed use development.
These priorities, which meet regional, citywide and local community goals should be incorporated into the RFP process. Affordable housing is especially expensive and desperately needed. Therefore, we urge WMATA, in cooperation with the District, to ensure that we maximize affordable housing opportunities at the site as a part of an overall project that creates great public spaces and increased bus, walk, and bicycle access.
We look forward to working with the community, local officials, and WMATA to shape future development plans to add new mixed income homes, shops, public spaces, improved walk and bicycle access, and better bus connections.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

CSG Testimony in Support of the Walkable Urban Streets Act
September 8, 2023
Council Member Eric Olson
Chair, Transportation, Infrastructure, Energy and Environment Committee (TIEE)
Prince George’s County Council
Wayne K. Curry Administration Bldg., 1301 McCormick Drive, 2nd Floor, Largo, MD 20774
Dear Chair Olson:
Please accept this letter on behalf of the Coalition for Smarter Growth (CSG). CSG is the leading non-profit organization in the Washington, D.C. region dedicated to making the case for smart growth. Our mission is to promote walkable, inclusive, and transit-oriented communities, and the land use and transportation policies and investments needed to make those communities flourish.
Thank you for introducing the Walkable Urban Streets Act, and our thanks as well to the eight co-sponsors. We are enthusiastic supporters of the Walkable Urban Streets Act, Council Bill 69-2023 and its companion resolutions CR 67-2023 and CR 68-2023.
This legislation updates and codifies DPW&T’s 2017 Urban Street Design Standards. These standards are to be applied to Regional Transit Districts and Local Centers as designated in Plan 2035. They will help build safer streets, especially for people walking and biking, and they will support transit-oriented development, a major priority of Prince George’s County.
The legislation is greatly needed for two reasons. First, the county’s roads are dangerous because they are too wide and too high speed. Fast, wide roads generate more severe crashes and the county leads the DC region in traffic and pedestrian deaths. The second reason to adopt this legislation is because walkable, bike-friendly street designs are necessary for high-quality and competitive transit-oriented development.
Despite prior adoption of the 2017 Urban Street Design Standards, DPIE and DPW&T have not taken advantage of opportunities to create the kinds of safer, vibrant, walkable, transit-oriented streets and places envisioned in Plan Prince George’s 2035. In fact, the streets in and near transit centers have remained overly-wide, fueling high speed traffic, making the roads dangerous for all users – people walking, bicycling, riding transit, and driving. For specific examples, see our companion fact sheet: Examples of urban street projects falling short of the 2017 standards.
One key reason is that the county’s traffic models often overpredict future traffic volumes, and do not adequately account for the increased walking, biking, and transit use in transit-oriented communities. Designing only for projected vehicle travel becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. The wider and faster the road, the less inviting it is for people walking, biking or taking transit, and the more driving it attracts.
This approach gives priority to speed over safety. It also undermines the economic development that occurs in a place where cars are slower and people want to be – the walkable, mixed-use, transit-accessible centers of activity that have been so successful in other parts of the region. In fact, some congestion is an indicator of a successful local economy. Plan 2035 recognizes this and the county’s transportation review standards allow for an urban level of traffic volumes on streets around mixed use transit centers and a focus on improving access by means other than driving.
The updated Urban Street Design Standards proposed in this bill require safer streets around transit districts and local centers, and include these components:
- 25 mph design speed maximum
- 2-4 travel lanes total roadway maximum
- 10′ travel lane widths (11′ for bus routes)
- 15′ corner radii (and no slip lanes/high speed turn lanes)
- Buffered walk and bike facilities
- On-street vehicle parking with bulbouts (where appropriate)
The Walkable Urban Streets Act will ensure the county is planning and building the streets needed for improved safety, people-oriented places, and economic success.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Cheryl Cort
Policy Director
Letter to NVTC re Seven Corners Ring Road
We are writing to express strong concerns about the proposed design of the Seven Corners Ring Road and to ask that NVTC not endorse the proposed design. Your proposed letter of endorsement to NVTAuthority is on your consent agenda and is item 3d.
CSG Comments: Montgomery County Pedestrian Master Plan
The Coalition for Smarter Growth strongly supports the Planning Board draft of the Pedestrian Master Plan. Its comprehensive approach to pedestrian safety and accessibility will advance our county’s climate and equity goals, help us reach Vision Zero, and establish Montgomery County as a model for other jurisdictions to follow.
The actions recommended in the Pedestrian Master Plan are visionary and ambitious—as we must be when tackling issues with the weight and urgency of climate change and increasing pedestrian injuries and fatalities.
We urge the Transportation & Environment Committee to support the Pedestrian Master Plan in full, and advance this visionary plan for a safer and more equitable Montgomery County.

CODE RED: A Call to Action for the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
With the approach of your annual retreat this week in Cambridge, Maryland, our 41 organizations in Maryland, DC, and Virginia call on you to take urgent action to address the great challenges of our times – climate change, housing, racial and economic inequity, sprawl and unsustainable transportation policies.
COMMENTS: Union Station SDEIS (Support)
Today, the new project vision defined in the FRA’s Supplemental Draft EIS (SDEIS) Preferred Alternative F presents a bold vision for the next century of Union Station’s existence and success, and will gain broad public and political support. The revised SDEIS Preferred Alternative includes major improvements we support the FRA including in the Final EIS:
Testimony: Duke Street Transitway (Support)
We strongly support Concept A for center running dedicated bus lanes and Concept Y for safe, separated bicycle and pedestrian facilities, as well as the vision for full-corridor length center running dedicated bus lanes when redevelopment and funding permit.
CSG Support for U Street Police & Fire Station Upzoning, ZC 23-02
We support the proposed land use designation change for the U Street police and fire station sites as proposed with the adoption of the 2021 Comprehensive Plan amendments.